IN the case of SERBA DINAMIK, the impression that I get is we are harping on the wrong set of people ie the main drivers of the company.
Where's your Mama gone
Little baby, Don?
Where's your mama gone?
Far, far away
Far, far away-ay-ay-ay-ay
Little baby, Don?
Where's your mama gone?
Far, far away
Far, far away-ay-ay-ay-ay
Where's your papa gone
Little baby, Don?
Where's your papa gone?
Far, far away
Far, far away-ay-ay-ay-ay
Little baby, Don?
Where's your papa gone?
Far, far away
Far, far away-ay-ay-ay-ay
WE should start with the Securities Commisson and Bursa Malaysia, especially the people who were on the initial public offer panel.
SOMEONE should ASK the people at the Securities Commision and Bursa Malaysia, how did Serba Dinamik get listed despite having
The whole concept of owner earnings designed and perfected by Warren Buffet gets straight to the point, that actually matters, namely how much cash falls into the business owner’s pockets.
Net income and EPS is all very nice under accounting principles, but the actual Riinggit value that the business owner receives at the end of the day/month/year is much different.
This is why Buffett calls it owner earning. So basically if the owner earning is negative every year, one can safely say, either company not making profits at all or very very thin profits.
READ & WATCH : WARREN BUFFETT’S OWNER’S EARNINGS CALCULATION.
WITH regards to EPF. READ : REMEMBER how EPF alerted the whole world, of the funds unhappiness with how things were panning out in Serba Dinamik, before the fund sold off a major portion of its shares?
ONE assumes, that EPF did so in the name of good governance. If indeed that is the case then EPF, must in the name of good governance tell the world what it has done with the remaining 4.9 per cent in Serba Dinamik?
LAST, I checked VIEW : EPF has not updated Bursa Malaysia on its shareholding and nor have they told working class Malaysia, what they have done with the Serba Dinamik shares.
THAT, to me in itself is BAD GOVERNANCE