COMING from a guy, who won't reveal READ: the whereabouts of his son in law wanted by the Interpol , Muhyiddin Yassin should be last guy to talk about of morals and ethics.
BETWEEN, Zahid Hamidi and Muhyiddin Yassin, the one who has a better case , for being a victim of political persecution is Zahid Hamidi, as Dr Mahathir's READ : self confession is weighty enough to suggest there were mala fide interest in play, to punish Zahid Hamidi.
MALAYSIANS generally don't like Zahid Hamidi, so they will keep silent as a church mouse that in the previous year's case involving Ultra Kirana, the case only started falling apart, when Zahid Hamidi's defense team forced the witnesses to cough out READ : so many other big names that were allegedly cash recipients of Ultra Kirana.
WHY has nobody demanded that the likes of Khairy Jamaluddin, Muhyiddin Yassin and Sharil Hamdan, who were named by Ultra Kirana be charged as well?
BECAUSE, you like their face is it?
SINCE we on the subject of cash recipients and morality, Muhyiddin Yassin, why don't you tell us if its morally and ethically correct to allow Bersatu to receive a RM195 million cash gift from Syed Mokthar Al Bukhary, merely 76 days after you extended a ten year rice monopoly concession to BERNAS, a unit 100 per cent owned by the tycoon.
