Bananas in pajamas are coming down the stairs,
Bananas in pajamas are coming down in pairs,
Bananas in pajamas are chasing teddy bears,
Basically EPF was treating the retail investor as a bunch of "Bananas in Pajamas" that ended up spooking them out from Serba Dinamik.
Why else would EPF state that READ : Bimbang perkembangan terkini Serba Dinamik and only then cease to be a substantial shareholder of Serba Dinamik?
Mind you before that EPF was happily selling Serba Dinamik shares without expressing any concern.
And once the EPF had ceased becoming a substantial shareholder according to the shareholding structure provided by Focus Malaysia, EPF still kept a sizeable amount of Serba Dinamik shares READ : Focus Malaysia : Employees Provident Fund (4.97%), the Retirement Fund (Inc) (4.53%) in Serba Dinamik
Was EPF trying to make monkeys of the retail investor or perhaps EPF itself have second thoughts about KPMG's claim and with that the audit firm’s credibility?
Whatever the reasons, the EPF should realise this that when they put their minds to it, the MONKEYS always WIN
READ : Any Monkey Can Beat The Market
And once the EPF had ceased becoming a substantial shareholder according to the shareholding structure provided by Focus Malaysia, EPF still kept a sizeable amount of Serba Dinamik shares READ : Focus Malaysia : Employees Provident Fund (4.97%), the Retirement Fund (Inc) (4.53%) in Serba Dinamik
Was EPF trying to make monkeys of the retail investor or perhaps EPF itself have second thoughts about KPMG's claim and with that the audit firm’s credibility?
Whatever the reasons, the EPF should realise this that when they put their minds to it, the MONKEYS always WIN
